1972 Jaguar XJ vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1972 Jaguar XJ. (251 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 1972 Jaguar XJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 620 kg more than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Jaguar XJ (408 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM). This means 1972 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Jaguar XJ | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJ | RX-Evolv |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5344 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9000 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 214 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |