1972 Jaguar XJ vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Jaguar XJ (251 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (80 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 650 kg more than 2003 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Jaguar XJ (408 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (188 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1972 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane. 1972 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Jaguar XJ | 2003 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XJ | Megane |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5344 cc | 1459 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 188 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 60 L |
