1972 Jaguar XJ vs. 2004 Lincoln Mark X
To start off, 2004 Lincoln Mark X is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln Mark X (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1972 Jaguar XJ. (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln Mark X should accelerate faster than 1972 Jaguar XJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln Mark X weights approximately 45 kg more than 1972 Jaguar XJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Jaguar XJ | 2004 Lincoln Mark X | |
Make | Jaguar | Lincoln |
Model | XJ | Mark X |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5344 cc | 3900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 233 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2770 mm |