1972 Jaguar XJ vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Jaguar XJ (251 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (228 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 442 kg more than 2006 Mazda RX-8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Jaguar XJ (408 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1972 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8. 1972 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Jaguar XJ 2006 Mazda RX-8
Make Jaguar Mazda
Model XJ RX-8
Year Released 1972 2006
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5344 cc 1308 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 251 HP 228 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 8200 RPM
Torque 408 Nm 211 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 70 mm 85 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1870 kg 1428 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2870 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]