1972 Jaguar XJ vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1972 Jaguar XJ. (251 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1972 Jaguar XJ.
Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Jaguar XJ (408 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda CX-9. (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1972 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Jaguar XJ | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJ | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5344 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 76 L |