1972 Jaguar XJ vs. 2010 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Jaguar XJ (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2010 Mazda CX-7. (244 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda CX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 162 kg more than 2010 Mazda CX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Jaguar XJ | 2010 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJ | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5344 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1718 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1646 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 69 L |