1972 Jaguar XJ vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 41 kg more than 1972 Jaguar XJ.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Jaguar XJ | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJ | XC60 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5344 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |