1972 Jaguar XJ vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (459 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1972 Jaguar XJ. (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1972 Jaguar XJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 456 kg more than 1972 Jaguar XJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Jaguar XJ | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | XJ | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5344 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 459 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 2336 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2156 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 93 L |