1972 Jaguar XJ vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1972 Jaguar XJ. (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 should accelerate faster than 1972 Jaguar XJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 182 kg more than 1972 Jaguar XJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Jaguar XJ | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJ | CX-09 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5344 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 2062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 76 L |