1972 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2010 Audi A3
To start off, 2010 Audi A3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A3 (140 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1972 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (109 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Because 1972 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2010 Audi A3 | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | Grand Wagoneer | A3 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2578 mm |