1972 Jensen Jensen-Healey vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Jensen Jensen-Healey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Jensen Jensen-Healey would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1972 Jensen Jensen-Healey. (120 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1972 Jensen Jensen-Healey.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1972 Jensen Jensen-Healey has manual transmission. 1972 Jensen Jensen-Healey will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Jensen Jensen-Healey | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Jensen | Jaguar |
| Model | Jensen-Healey | XJ |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1973 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 297 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 85 L |
