1972 Lancia 2000 vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Lancia 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Lancia 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Lancia 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Lancia 2000 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Renault Megane. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Lancia 2000 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Lancia 2000 (171 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Megane. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1972 Lancia 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Lancia 2000 | 2010 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Lancia | Renault |
| Model | 2000 | Megane |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2690 mm |
