1972 Lancia Fulvia vs. 1988 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1988 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Lancia Fulvia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 140 kg more than 1972 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 1988 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Lancia Fulvia | 1988 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Fulvia | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1972 | 1988 |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1910 mm |