1972 Lincoln Continental vs. 2006 Mazda 6

To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,542 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Lincoln Continental (217 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 6. (215 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1210 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Lincoln Continental (488 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 6. (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1972 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: