1972 Matra-Simca M530 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 1,699 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Matra-Simca M530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1972 Matra-Simca M530. (71 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1972 Matra-Simca M530.
Because 1972 Matra-Simca M530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Matra-Simca M530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Matra-Simca M530 (128 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (127 Nm). This means 1972 Matra-Simca M530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Matra-Simca M530 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Renault |
| Model | M530 | Megane |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 1389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2690 mm |
