1972 Matra-Simca M530 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 1,699 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Matra-Simca M530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1972 Matra-Simca M530. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1972 Matra-Simca M530.
Because 1972 Matra-Simca M530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Matra-Simca M530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Matra-Simca M530. (128 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Matra-Simca M530.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Matra-Simca M530 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Mazda |
| Model | M530 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |
