1972 Matra-Simca M670 vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 (444 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 396 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Renault Clio weights approximately 130 kg more than 1972 Matra-Simca M670.
Because 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Matra-Simca M670. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Matra-Simca M670 | 1991 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Renault |
| Model | M670 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1991 |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 48 HP |
| Engine RPM | 11000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2550 mm |
