1972 Matra-Simca M670 vs. 2004 Mazda 2
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 (444 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 377 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1972 Matra-Simca M670.
Because 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Matra-Simca M670. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Matra-Simca M670 | 2004 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Mazda |
| Model | M670 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 11000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2500 mm |
