1972 Mazda 1000 vs. 2003 Volkswagen Bora
To start off, 2003 Volkswagen Bora is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,900 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Volkswagen Bora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volkswagen Bora (89 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 1000. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volkswagen Bora should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 1000.
Because 1972 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volkswagen Bora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 1000 | 2003 Volkswagen Bora | |
| Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
| Model | 1000 | Bora |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 987 cc | 1900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
