1972 Mazda 1000 vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 311 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 1000. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 1000 | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 1000 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 987 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 77 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |