1972 Mazda 1000 vs. 2009 Renault Symbol

To start off, 2009 Renault Symbol is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Symbol is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Symbol (74 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 1000. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Symbol should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Symbol weights approximately 290 kg more than 1972 Mazda 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Symbol, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Symbol (105 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm). This means 2009 Renault Symbol will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 1000. 2009 Renault Symbol has automatic transmission and 1972 Mazda 1000 has manual transmission. 1972 Mazda 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Renault Symbol will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: