1972 Mazda 1000 vs. 2010 Audi A5
To start off, 2010 Audi A5 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi A5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A5 (211 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 1000. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 1000.
Because 1972 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A5 (349 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 1000 | 2010 Audi A5 | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | 1000 | A5 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 987 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 77 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4625 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1382 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2751 mm |
