1972 Mazda 110 S vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda 110 S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda 110 S (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda 110 S should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda 110 S weights approximately 156 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (182 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 110 S | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 110 S | Clio |
Year Released | 1972 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1108 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 48 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 182 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2470 mm |