1972 Mazda 110 S vs. 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe
To start off, 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda 110 S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda 110 S (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda 110 S should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda 110 S weights approximately 246 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda 110 S (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda 110 S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 110 S | 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | 110 S | Smart & Pulse City Coupe |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 599 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 1820 mm |
