1972 Mazda 110 S vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda 110 S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda 110 S (108 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda 110 S should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda 110 S weights approximately 222 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda 110 S (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda 110 S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 110 S | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | 110 S | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 599 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 1810 mm |
