1972 Mazda 110 S vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Falcon (210 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Falcon weights approximately 519 kg more than 1972 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 110 S | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 110 S | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3984 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 357 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1485 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2730 mm |
