1972 Mazda 110 S vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 110 S.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 110 S | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 110 S | Epica |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2700 mm |