1972 Mazda 110 S vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 110 S.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 110 S | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
| Model | 110 S | XF |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2908 mm |
