1972 Mazda 616 vs. 1978 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 1978 Datsun 280Z is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Datsun 280Z (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Datsun 280Z should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Datsun 280Z weights approximately 290 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Datsun 280Z (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1978 Datsun 280Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 616 | 1978 Datsun 280Z | |
| Make | Mazda | Datsun |
| Model | 616 | 280Z |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1978 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 79 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4399 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2304 mm |
