1972 Mazda 616 vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 1978 Volvo 66 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda 616 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda 616 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1978 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda 616 (124 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 1972 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 616 | 66 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |