1972 Mazda 616 vs. 1982 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1982 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 180 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 1982 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 616 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1972 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2620 mm |