1972 Mazda 616 vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1982 Toyota Celica is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (115 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 255 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 616 | Celica |
Year Released | 1972 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2620 mm |