1972 Mazda 616 vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1994 Rover Range Rover is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (134 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover Range Rover (271 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1994 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 616 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1972 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 82.8 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |