1972 Mazda 616 vs. 1998 Peugeot Tulip
To start off, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,996 cc, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda 616 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (205 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 1998 Peugeot Tulip will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 1998 Peugeot Tulip | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 616 | Tulip |
Year Released | 1972 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 205 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 880 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2390 mm |