1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2001 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2001 Toyota Condor is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Condor (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Condor weights approximately 536 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Condor (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 616 | 2001 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | 616 | Condor |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 86 mm |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1446 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2670 mm |
