1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda 616 (79 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 60 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda 616 (124 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1972 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 616 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | 616 | Smart |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 73 HP |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 84.8 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2510 mm |
