1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 90 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 616 | Clio |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 70 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2590 mm |