1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,437 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Condor (108 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 595 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Condor (192 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 616 | Condor |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 86 mm |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1505 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2640 mm |