1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2004 Vector M12
To start off, 2004 Vector M12 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Vector M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Vector M12 (484 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 405 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Vector M12 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Vector M12 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Vector M12 (576 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 452 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Vector M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 2004 Vector M12 | |
Make | Mazda | Vector |
Model | 616 | M12 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 5707 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 484 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 576 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |