1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 278 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 616 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 616 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
