1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2008 Opel Omega
To start off, 2008 Opel Omega is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Opel Omega (177 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Opel Omega weights approximately 775 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Opel Omega (241 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 2008 Opel Omega | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 616 | Omega |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 83.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 79.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1685 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2740 mm |