1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 199 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 616 | Calais |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 124 Nm | 350 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |