1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2010 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2010 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Hyundai Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Hyundai Matrix (102 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 413 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Hyundai Matrix (141 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Hyundai Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 2010 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | Mazda | Hyundai |
Model | 616 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1323 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |