1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 616 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 616 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2640 mm |
