1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 665 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 616 | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Mazda | Kia |
| Model | 616 | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 290 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2845 mm |
