1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2011 Proton Arena
To start off, 2011 Proton Arena is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Proton Arena (86 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Proton Arena should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Proton Arena weights approximately 125 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 124 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 2011 Proton Arena | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | 616 | Arena |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1468 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |