1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 699 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (240 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 616 | S60 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 124 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2776 mm |