1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (222 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1701 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 616 | E-Series |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 222 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 2611 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2085 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3505 mm |