1972 Mazda 818 vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1972 Mazda 818 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1972 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 818 | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 818 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2700 mm |