1972 Mazda 818 vs. 2000 Audi A6
To start off, 2000 Audi A6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A6 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1972 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mazda 818. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A6 (350 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 818 | 2000 Audi A6 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | 818 | A6 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2770 mm |